Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 492 patients in a vegetative state in 29 Italian rehabilitation units. What about outcome?

Recent studies on recovery of consciousness of subjects in a vegetative state (VS) admitted to rehabilitation units have focused mainly on the identification of prognostic factors, whereas few studies have focused on outcome. The aim of this study was to compare demographic and clinical data and report functional outcome of patients in a VS due to severe acquired brain injury (ABI) of different aetiologies. The study was a retrospective multicentre cohort study and involved 492 patients in a VS due to traumatic (TBI) or non-traumatic (NTBI) severe ABI admitted to 29 Italian rehabilitation units. Demographic and clinical data recorded included age, gender, aetiology, Glasgow Coma Scale score; onset-to-admission interval; length of stay in the rehabilitation unit; the department from which they were referred; and the presence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or tracheostomy. Recovery of consciousness and disability were evaluated using a discharge Disability Rating Scale. At discharge, 53.11% patients had emerged from VS, with TBI subjects significantly more likely to recover consciousness than NTBI ones. Subjects with NTBI had a significantly worse prognosis than those with TBI, and within the NTBI group, subjects with a cerebrovascular aetiology had a better outcome than those with an anoxic aetiology. Among the patients who emerged from VS, 71.30% of TBI and 83.06% of NTBI subjects presented extremely severe disability. Only 37.93% of subjects affected by TBI and 17.44% of those affected by NTBI who presented extremely severe disability returned home after their rehabilitation stay. Even though almost a half of the patients emerged from VS, a large number of these subjects showed severe disability, often making it impossible for them to return home. This situation has a major impact on the healthcare system.

Topical distribution of initial paresis of the limbs to predict clinically relevant spasticity after ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The degree of initial paresis relates to spasticity development in stroke patients. However, the importance of proximal and distal paresis in predicting spasticity after stroke is unclear. AIM: To investigate the role of topical distribution of initial limb paresis to predict clinically relevant spasticity in adults with stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study METHODS: Seventy-two first-ever ischemic stroke patients were examined. At the acute phase of illness, demographics and the European Stroke Scale motor items (maintenance of outstretched arm position, arm raising, wrist extension, grip strength, maintenance of outstretched leg position, leg flexion, foot dorsiflexion) were evaluated. At six months after the stroke onset, spasticity was assessed at the upper and lower limb with the modified Ashworth Scale. Clinically relevant spasticity was defined as modified Ashworth Scale ≥3 (0-5). RESULTS: The degree of initial paresis of the proximal muscles of the upper limb and the distal muscles of the lower limb showed the strongest association and the best profile of sensitivity-specificity in predicting clinically relevant spasticity at the upper and lower limb, respectively. Younger age showed higher risk for developing clinically relevant spasticity in the upper limb. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that the initial degree of proximal paresis of the upper limb and distal paresis of the lower limb as well as age may be considered early predictors of clinically relevant spasticity in adults with ischemic stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Our findings further improve the role of initial paresis as predictor of spasticity after stroke.

The Italian National Registry of severe acquired brain injury: epidemiological, clinical and functional data of 1469 patients.

BACKGROUND: The lack of knowledge about epidemiological and clinical data of patients with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) admitted to Rehabilitation facilities in Italy led to the creation, in June 2008, of a data collection on-line registry. AIM: To collect epidemiological and clinical data and to evaluate functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic and non-traumatic ABI admitted to Rehabilitation facilities in Italy between June 2008 and December 2011 and to compare data of patients with ABI of different aetiologies. DESIGN: Observational retrospective study. SETTING: The study involved 29 Italian Rehabilitation facilities. POPULATION: The study enrolled 1469 patients with severe traumatic (TBI) and non-traumatic ABI (NTBI). METHODS: Data collected included demographic (number of patients with TBI and NTBI, gender, age) and clinical characteristics (provenience, number of days elapsed between onset and rehabilitation admission, rehabilitation length of stay, discharge destination, death and vegetative state diagnosis, presence of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, tracheostomy, pressure sores and paraosteoarthropathies). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Disability Rating Scale. RESULTS: Of the whole population studied, 44.31% and 55.69% patients had suffered a TBI and a NTBI, respectively. In the NTBI group 40.09% had a cerebrovascular injury, 12.04% an anoxic brain damage, 3.6% had a brain injury of other causes. The mean age was 43.67 and 56.68 for subjects with TBI and NTBI, respectively. Patients with TBI showed a lower onset-admission interval (OAI), compared with NTBI group; no difference in rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) was recorded between groups. Patients with TBI presented a lower DRS score at admission and discharge and returned home more frequently than NTBI group. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a National registry allows the collection of data about patients with ABI in order to study the clinical course, the functional outcome and to establish a basis for comparison with other data sources. Clinical Rehabilitation Impact. Data collection could be useful in the evaluation and planning of rehabilitation pathways, and to assess the allocation of healthcare and rehabilitative resources.